Fighting for Good Nutrition
I’m really struggling with what I’m tasked to write about these days, because it often contradicts my ethics and beliefs. As I’ve mentioned in past posts, I’ve had to compromise quite often while writing for one of my freelance clients. Because they’re my main source of income at the moment, I can’t refuse the jobs. The only saving grace (for me) is that my byline is not on the materials since it’s more or less marketing copy that I’m writing.
Today, I’m writing copy about the NuVal system, which I personally find to be absurd and a waste of research money when it comes to nutrition. The NuVal system scores food on a scale of 1 to 100. The higher the score, the higher the nutrition. Although the system considers hundreds of nutrients in their calculation, they leave out one major ingredient: the consumer.
Grocery stores are jumping on board left and right and accepting the system with open arms. For the stores, the system will lead to a less educated consumer, who will in turn put more products into their carts with a passing glance of a number ranging from 1 to 100. Because of this, the consumer will be less likely to read nutrition labels, lists of ingredients, and fail to educate themselves on what they’re putting into their bodies.
Product manufacturers, on the other hand, are outraged because some of the numbers given to many of their products are so low that they’re worried sales will drop. In this case, I hope that happens since it’s mainly junk food and sugary cereals that are stamped with a low number. Even though this hits a majority of the junk food below the belt, it still leaves a good percentage of processed foods in the vague category of being healthy. The scoring system doesn’t take into account conventional vs. organic, and, as far as I understand, it doesn’t take into consideration preservatives that are called “natural” but are so heavily processed they’re anything but natural — I’m guessing this based on a score of 40 for a Kashi oatmeal cookie.
I’ll never know for sure though because the NuVal company will not reveal their exact formula or criteria for how they evaluate and score foods. And to me, keeping a secret like that is a terrible way to advance good nutrition; they’re still keeping people in the dark about what they’re consuming.
Sometimes I feel like a minority, spreading the word about eating whole, healthy foods and cooking from scratch. Am I the only one out there that skips the cereal aisle at the grocery store?
Featured Culinary Schools
- Alumni have appeared in reality competition shows such as Top Chef and Project Runway.
- Has a team of about 4,000 faculty members focused on helping students tap opportunities in a marketplace driven by ideas.
- Offers programs in design, media arts, fashion, and culinary.
- Provides program coordinators who work with students to ensure they have the learning materials, assignments, facilities, and faculty to get the most out of the program.
- Over 50 campus locations nationwide.
- Flexible Scheduling
- Financial Aid
- Transferable Credits
- Offers more than 150 self-paced, career-relevant programs that are connected to a supportive 24/7 online community of students and faculty.
- Profiled in many publications such as The Boston Globe, Fox Business, and Inside Higher Ed.
- Nearly 25,000 graduates each year.
- Accredited by the Distance Education Accrediting Commission (DEAC).
- Founded in 1890 in Scranton, Pennsylvania
- Online Courses
- Its first location, in Paris, officially opened its doors as a culinary school in 1895.
- Teaches students by having them spend significant time in the kitchen practicing precision techniques.
- Provide hands-on training from instructors who are certified, master chefs.
- Offer flexible schedules and online programs.
- Has 30 schools worldwide, spanning 5 continents, including 17 campuses in the U.S.
- Flexible Scheduling
- Financial Aid